Deprecated: Function WP_Dependencies->add_data() was called with an argument that is deprecated since version 6.9.0! IE conditional comments are ignored by all supported browsers. in /home/z09spz0u4y57/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6260

Trade Finance Poll: Singapore 2023

295 respondents

December 2023

Singapore is the region’s most internationally oriented trade-finance and treasury market. Its respondents have the largest trade volumes, most diversified corridors, most sophisticated banking structures and highest digital maturity. Singapore received a record US$143 billion of FDI in 2024, 6% more than in 2023, reinforcing its role as a regional finance, trading and supply-chain-management hub.

1. Top trade and working-capital priorities

What are your organisation’s three most important trade-finance, supply-chain-finance or cross-border working-capital priorities over the next 12 months?

Select up to three.

  • Securing adequate trade-finance limits or facilities (34%)
  • Reducing the cost of trade and working-capital finance
  • Improving access to pre-shipment or post-shipment export finance
  • Improving access to import finance, inventory finance or supplier-payment finance
  • Reducing days sales outstanding and accelerating receivables collection (40%)
  • Extending supplier-payment terms without weakening supplier relationships
  • Accessing supplier finance, payable finance or dynamic discounting (45%)
  • Obtaining receivables finance, invoice discounting or factoring (45%)
  • Improving trade-document processing and reducing paper (55%)
  • Managing FX exposure associated with imports, exports or overseas suppliers (51%)
  • Diversifying export markets, suppliers or trade corridors
  • Improving supply-chain resilience and supplier liquidity (57%)
  • Strengthening sanctions, compliance and counterparty-risk management
  • Improving visibility of purchase orders, shipments, invoices and payments (55%)
  • Other

2. Greatest obstacle

Which single issue creates the greatest difficulty for your organisation’s cross-border trade, trade finance or supply-chain finance today?

Select one.

  • Insufficient bank credit limits or restricted access to trade-finance facilities
  • High interest margins, fees or collateral requirements
  • Slow bank approvals, onboarding or documentation processes
  • Excessive paper documentation or inconsistent trade-document requirements (10%)
  • Delayed payment by overseas buyers or domestic customers (15%)
  • Difficulty obtaining supplier credit or managing supplier-payment terms
  • Limited access to receivables finance or invoice discounting
  • FX volatility or difficulty hedging trade-related currency exposure (16%)
  • Counterparty, country, sanctions or compliance risk (13%)
  • Supply-chain disruption, shipment delays or uncertain delivery schedules (18%)
  • Limited digital integration between our systems, banks and trade partners (22%)
  • Lack of internal expertise in trade finance, documentation or compliance
  • Other (6%)

3. Cross-border trade scale

Approximately what was your organisation’s total annual cross-border trade turnover—imports plus exports—over the most recent 12 months?

Please select a range. Responses will be reported only in aggregate and never attributed to an individual company.

  • Less than US$1 million (3%)
  • US$1 million to less than US$5 million (8%)
  • US$5 million to less than US$25 million (17%)
  • US$25 million to less than US$100 million (24%)
  • US$100 million to less than US$250 million (20%)
  • US$250 million to less than US$500 million (13%)
  • US$500 million to less than US$1 billion (15%)
  • US$1 billion to less than US$5 billion
  • US$5 billion or more
  • Prefer not to say

Note: “Cross-border trade turnover” means the aggregate value of the organisation’s imports and exports of goods and relevant trade-related services. It should exclude purely domestic sales.

4. Trade profile and payment terms

Which statement best describes your organisation’s main trade profile?

Select one.

  • Predominantly exporter (27%)
  • Predominantly importer (21%)
  • Broadly balanced importer and exporter (35%)
  • Domestic anchor buyer with a substantial supplier base (9%)
  • Domestic supplier to local and multinational buyers (5%)
  • Logistics, freight-forwarding or trade-service provider
  • Cross-border e-commerce or marketplace seller
  • Other (3%)

What are the most common settlement terms in your cross-border trade?

Select up to two.

  • Advance payment (13%)
  • Open-account trade (61%)
  • Documentary letter of credit (24%)
  • Documentary collection
  • Bank guarantee or standby letter of credit (18%)
  • Supplier credit (29%)
  • Buyer credit or export credit
  • Not sure

This question is particularly valuable because traditional trade instruments remain important, but trade-bank revenue and client demand are shifting toward open-account and supply-chain-finance structures. A 2025 CGI/BAFT survey found respondents expected traditional trade products to fall below half of expected trade-finance revenue over the next five years, while open account and SCF continued to expand

5. Trade-finance access and use

Which trade-finance and supply-chain-finance solutions does your organisation currently use, and which are you likely to seek or expand over the next 24 months?

For each item, select: “Currently use”, “Plan to use/expand”, “Aware but no current plan”, or “Not familiar”.

SolutionResult
Import letter of creditCurrently use (35%); Plan to use/expand (12%)
Export letter of credit confirmation or discounting—
Import loan or trust receipt—
Pre-shipment financeCurrently use (38%); Plan to use/expand (19%)
Post-shipment financeCurrently use (38%); Plan to use/expand (19%)
Bank guarantee, performance bond or standby letter of creditCurrently use (39%); Plan to use/expand (17%)
Receivables finance, factoring or invoice discountingCurrently use (34%); Plan to use/expand (27%)
Supplier finance/payables financeCurrently use (30%); Plan to use/expand (31%)
Distributor finance—
Inventory finance—
Purchase-order finance—
Trade-credit insurance-backed finance—
Export-credit agency-backed finance—
Digital trade-document platformCurrently use (39%); Plan to use/expand (34%)
Trade-related FX hedgingCurrently use (55%); Plan to use/expand (25%)

6. Banking relationship model and selection criteria

Which statement best describes your current trade-finance and supply-chain-finance banking model?

Select one.

  • One primary bank provides most of our trade-finance and supply-chain-finance facilities (11%)
  • We use a lead bank supported by several specialist, local or correspondent banks (48%)
  • We use multiple banks, with no dominant trade-finance provider (29%)
  • Trade-finance banking is selected separately by country, subsidiary or business unit (5%)
  • We are actively reviewing, consolidating or re-tendering our trade-finance banks (7%)
  • We expect to add banks, fintechs, insurers or specialist finance providers in the next 12 months

What would most influence a decision to appoint, retain or expand a trade-finance or SCF bank relationship?

Select up to three.

  • Credit appetite, facility size and speed of limit approval
  • Competitive pricing, margins, fees and collateral terms
  • Cross-border network, local-market reach and correspondent-bank capability (64%)
  • Expertise in our industry, products and trade corridors
  • Digital trade platform, APIs and ERP integration (60%)
  • Speed and quality of implementation, onboarding and client service (41%)
  • Documentary-trade expertise and handling of discrepancies
  • Supply-chain-finance programme design and supplier onboarding (46%)
  • FX capability, pricing and hedging support (55%)
  • Risk, sanctions, compliance and regulatory expertise (52%)
  • Receivables finance, credit insurance or export-credit capability
  • Sustainability-linked trade, supply-chain or working-capital solutions
  • Data, reporting and visibility of transactions and supply-chain flows

7. Trade digitisation maturity

How would you assess your organisation’s current capability in trade-document management and digital connectivity?

CapabilityLargely paper/manualPartly digitisedMostly digitisedFully integrated/digital
Preparation and exchange of invoices, purchase orders and shipping documents(15%)(35%)(36%)(14%)
Presentation and handling of letters of credit, collections or guarantees○○○○
Connectivity between ERP/procurement systems and banks(12%)(29%)(41%)(18%)
Visibility of purchase orders, shipments, invoices and payment status○○○○
Onboarding and administration of suppliers or distributors into finance programmes○○○○

Digitalisation should be measured directly, rather than assumed. Trade-bank research has consistently identified digitisation, platform modernisation and intelligent process automation as major priorities, while corporate clients often remain constrained by paper, fragmented data and onboarding complexity.

8. Supply-chain finance and supplier resilience

Which working-capital or supply-chain-finance needs would you most like a bank or finance provider to address?

Select up to three.

  • Financing suppliers earlier against approved invoices (47%)
  • Extending buyer payment terms while protecting supplier liquidity
  • Financing suppliers that are too small or too remote to access conventional bank credit (29%)
  • Financing distributors, dealers or downstream customers (32%)
  • Receivables finance against domestic or export invoices (44%)
  • Inventory or warehouse finance
  • Purchase-order or pre-shipment funding
  • Dynamic discounting or early-payment programmes
  • Better visibility of supplier financial health and supply-chain risk (37%)
  • Faster onboarding of suppliers into finance programmes
  • Financing linked to sustainability, decarbonisation or responsible sourcing (26%)
  • Trade-credit insurance, guarantees or risk-sharing structures
  • We have no current need for supply-chain finance (6%)
  • Not sure

This question lets banks identify demand for supplier finance beyond large anchor programmes. The ADB specifically highlights the potential of deeper-tier SCF to use anchor-buyer creditworthiness to reach smaller suppliers, while noting that SME access to trade finance remains a material issue.

9. Planned actions and provider-switching intent

Over the next 12–24 months, what actions is your organisation most likely to take in trade finance, supply-chain finance or cross-border working capital?

Select all that apply.

  • Request additional trade-finance limits or larger facilities
  • Issue an RFP or review trade-finance banks (34%)
  • Add new local, regional or global trade-finance providers (28%)
  • Reduce or consolidate the number of trade-finance banks
  • Implement or upgrade a digital trade platform (49%)
  • Integrate ERP, procurement or logistics systems with bank platforms or APIs (49%)
  • Expand supplier finance, payable finance or dynamic discounting (34%)
  • Introduce receivables finance, factoring or invoice discounting
  • Increase use of guarantees, standby LCs or trade-credit insurance
  • Expand FX hedging associated with trade flows (27%)
  • Diversify export markets, suppliers or shipping routes
  • Introduce sustainability-linked supplier or trade-finance programmes
  • Make no major change (7%)
  • Not sure